A digital portfolio system used to monitor learner progress across clinical settings, provide timely feedback, and identify areas where learners need additional support.
Brief Summary
Digital portfolios were implemented across academic and clinical settings to help faculty and preceptors monitor learner progress, give timely feedback, and identify areas where learners needed additional support. The shared platform served as an online dashboard documenting learner development across clinical settings, including patient encounters, procedures, hours completed, and reflective learning. Faculty and preceptors reviewed portfolio entries, provided feedback, and assessed progress in relation to defined competencies. Using a common platform across academic and practice settings supported coordinated expectations, competency-based education, and continuous learner support
Guiding Principles Alignment
This case model aligns with AACN/AONL Guiding Principles by promoting shared responsibility for learner development, transparency in assessment, and alignment between academic and practice expectations. The digital portfolio supported consistent communication, co-assessment, and continuous feedback across settings. By emphasizing learner reflection, competency tracking, and readiness for practice, the model strengthened academic–practice collaboration and supported high-quality, competency-based education responsive to clinical practice needs.
Problem Statement & Goals
Problem/Need Identified:
Faculty and preceptors needed a consistent way to monitor learner progress, provide timely feedback, and coordinate assessment across multiple clinical settings. Traditional evaluation methods made it difficult to track learner development longitudinally or align expectations between academic programs and practice sites. There was a need for a shared system that supported competency-based education and allowed learners, faculty, and preceptors to view progress across settings.
Goals & Objectives:
-
Support competency-based education across academic and practice settings
-
Improve coordination of learner assessment and feedback
-
Encourage learner reflection and self-assessment
Intervention & Strategy
Description of Intervention:
A regional nursing education consortium implemented a digital portfolio system across multiple academic programs and clinical facilities. Learners documented patient encounters, procedures, clinical hours, and reflections throughout each rotation. Faculty and preceptors reviewed entries using rubrics linked to the AACN Essentials and provided ongoing feedback. The shared platform supported continuous assessment, reflection, and coordination across institutions.
Roles & Responsibilities:
Learners documented clinical experiences and reflected on learning. Faculty and clinical educators reviewed portfolio entries, provided feedback, and assessed competency progression. Academic and practice partners jointly selected and implemented the platform, aligned expectations, and used the system for formative and summative evaluation.
Resources Utilized:
Several vendors offer digital portfolio systems to support competency tracking. In this model, costs were shared: learners covered fees through academic programs, while hospitals covered costs related to implementation and clinical use. Faculty and clinical educator time supported review and assessment activities.
Outcome Metrics
Educational Outcomes:
- Improved learner self-assessment and reflection
- Clearer documentation of competency development aligned with AACN Essentials
- Faculty used the platform for mid-term and final evaluations
Workforce Outcomes:
- Reduced administrative burden for faculty and preceptors
- Improved alignment between academic and clinical expectations
Clinical Outcomes:
- Enhanced readiness for clinical practice through real-time feedback and competency tracking
Sustainability & Scalability
Sustainability Plan:
The digital portfolio system supports sustained use through shared access across academic and practice settings. Regular use for documentation, feedback, and evaluation embeds the platform into routine educational and clinical workflows.
Replication Potential:
This model can be replicated by other academic–practice partnerships using centralized digital platforms to track learner progress. Shared competency frameworks and coordinated access enable adaptation across institutions and clinical environments.
Lessons Learned
Key Success Factors:
- Shared visibility of learner progress across settings
- Real-time feedback and competency-based assessment
- Learner reflection encouraged critical thinking and confidence
Challenges & Solutions:
Even in clinical sites requiring standardized evaluation forms across disciplines, the digital portfolio helped customize learning and reinforce academic–practice alignment. Faculty and preceptors used the platform to supplement required evaluations while maintaining consistency.
Editorial Review Notice:
Submissions may be edited by AACN for clarity, grammar, formatting, length, and consistency with publication standards. AACN will make every effort to preserve the original intent and meaning of the submission.